Brain · 2011

Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia

Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, van Swieten JC, Seelaar H, Dopper EG, Onyike CU, Hillis AE, Josephs KA, Boeve BF, Kertesz A, Seeley WW, Rankin KP, Johnson JK, Gorno-Tempini ML, Rosen H, Prioleau-Latham CE, Lee A, Kipps CM, Lillo P, Piguet O, Rohrer JD, Rossor MN, Warren JD, Fox NC, Galasko D, Salmon DP, Black SE, Mesulam M, Weintraub S, Dickerson BC, Diehl-Schmid J, Pasquier F, Deramecourt V, Lebert F, Pijnenburg Y, Chow TW, Manes F, Grafman J, Cappa SF, Freedman M, Grossman M, Miller BL.

Show affiliations
  • Rascovsky KDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 3 West Gates, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. katyaras@mail.med.upenn.edu
99 read13 want to readRigor 2.7Novelty 2.9Impact 2.9Reprod. 3.3

Most-cited papers citing this

  • Neurology · 2026 · cited by 2
  • Brain · 2026 · cited by 1
  • Alzheimers Res Ther · 2026 · cited by 1
  • Cereb Cortex · 2026 · cited by 1
  • Int J Geriatr Psychiatry · 2026 · cited by 1

Log in to like, log, and share thoughts on this paper.

Discussion

Share your thoughts above to start a thread. Constructive feedback only — reply to and like others’ posts.

0

Alex Cohen

Rigor 3/5Novelty 3/5Impact 3/5Reprod. 5/5

Solid methods, convincing results.

0

Hugo Wang

Rigor 4/5Novelty 3/5Impact 2/5Reprod. 1/5

Solid methods, convincing results.

0

Maya Patel

Rigor 5/5Novelty 2/5Impact 3/5Reprod. 2/5

Solid methods, convincing results.

0

Jonas Lee

Rigor 1/5Novelty 1/5Impact 1/5Reprod. 5/5

Interesting idea, small sample.

0

Tom Sato

Rigor 1/5Novelty 1/5Impact 5/5Reprod. 1/5

Interesting idea, small sample.

0

Ines Khan

Rigor 2/5Novelty 1/5Impact 3/5Reprod. 3/5

Replication is unclear to me.

0

Noor Silva

Rigor 3/5Novelty 3/5Impact 3/5Reprod. 3/5

Nice but incremental.

0

Ines Silva

Rigor 2/5Novelty 4/5Impact 2/5Reprod. 5/5

Replication is unclear to me.

0

Nadia Rossi

Rigor 1/5Novelty 5/5Impact 3/5Reprod. 1/5

Great figures and clear story.

0

Tom Patel

Rigor 2/5Novelty 4/5Impact 3/5Reprod. 5/5

Replication is unclear to me.

0

Ravi Nguyen

Rigor 1/5Novelty 5/5Impact 4/5Reprod. 3/5

Great figures and clear story.

0

Liam Cohen

Rigor 4/5Novelty 1/5Impact 2/5Reprod. 5/5

Important contribution to the field.

0

Ken Park

Rigor 5/5Novelty 3/5Impact 1/5Reprod. 2/5

Important contribution to the field.

0

Eva Rossi

Rigor 3/5Novelty 3/5Impact 3/5Reprod. 3/5

Replication is unclear to me.

0

Sara Rossi

Rigor 2/5Novelty 1/5Impact 2/5Reprod. 4/5

Solid methods, convincing results.

0

Hugo Rossi

Rigor 2/5Novelty 4/5Impact 4/5Reprod. 1/5

Great figures and clear story.

0

Tom Cohen

Rigor 4/5Novelty 2/5Impact 4/5Reprod. 5/5

Great figures and clear story.

0

Jonas Kim

Rigor 1/5Novelty 2/5Impact 5/5Reprod. 5/5

Important contribution to the field.

0

Omar Mueller

Rigor 4/5Novelty 3/5Impact 1/5Reprod. 3/5

Replication is unclear to me.

0

Nadia Garcia

Rigor 1/5Novelty 5/5Impact 5/5Reprod. 5/5

Replication is unclear to me.

0

Hugo Lee

Rigor 1/5Novelty 4/5Impact 1/5Reprod. 2/5

Interesting idea, small sample.

0

Ravi Lee

Rigor 1/5Novelty 3/5Impact 3/5Reprod. 2/5

Solid methods, convincing results.

0

Liam Sato

Rigor 1/5Novelty 3/5Impact 2/5Reprod. 5/5

Replication is unclear to me.

0

Alex Sato

Rigor 4/5Novelty 3/5Impact 5/5Reprod. 5/5

Important contribution to the field.

0

Pablo Brown

Rigor 2/5Novelty 1/5Impact 3/5Reprod. 1/5

Interesting idea, small sample.

0

Eva Nguyen

Rigor 5/5Novelty 1/5Impact 5/5Reprod. 2/5

Important contribution to the field.

0

Tariq Park

Rigor 5/5Novelty 2/5Impact 4/5Reprod. 5/5

Replication is unclear to me.

0

Sam Garcia

Rigor 1/5Novelty 2/5Impact 4/5Reprod. 5/5

Solid methods, convincing results.

0

Ravi Patel

Rigor 5/5Novelty 2/5Impact 1/5Reprod. 3/5

Important contribution to the field.

0

Mei Smith

Rigor 1/5Novelty 5/5Impact 5/5Reprod. 1/5

Great figures and clear story.