2026

Differential assembly of mouse and human tumor microenvironments

Courau T, Jaszczak RG, Samad B, Flynn E, Chew NW, Reeder GC, Tsui J, Teklu S, Pass LF, Edwards AW, Naser M, Ray A, Wismer H, Bunis D, Lupin-Jimenez L, Gavil NV, Masopust D, Graham JP, Skelly DA, Vesco X, Liu ET, Fragiadakis GK, Combes AJ, Krummel MF.

Show affiliations
  • Courau TDepartment of Pathology and ImmunoX Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA. tristan.courau@ucsf.edu.
  • Jaszczak RGCoLabs, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Samad BImmunoProfiler Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Flynn ECoLabs, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Chew NWDepartment of Pathology and ImmunoX Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Reeder GCDepartment of Pathology and ImmunoX Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Tsui JDepartment of Pathology and ImmunoX Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Teklu SDepartment of Pathology and ImmunoX Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Pass LFDepartment of Pathology and ImmunoX Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Edwards AWCoLabs, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Naser MCoLabs, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Ray ADepartment of Pathology and ImmunoX Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Wismer HDepartment of Pathology and ImmunoX Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Bunis DCoLabs, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Lupin-Jimenez LCoLabs, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Gavil NVDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Masopust DDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Graham JPThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
  • Skelly DAThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
  • Vesco XThe Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
  • Liu ETThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
  • Fragiadakis GKCoLabs, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Combes AJDepartment of Pathology and ImmunoX Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Krummel MFDepartment of Pathology and ImmunoX Initiative, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA. max.krummel@ucsf.edu.
1 read0 want to readRigor 3.0Novelty 5.0Impact 3.0Reprod. 2.0

Mouse models are frequently used to develop treatments for human cancer. However, the degree to which their tumor microenvironments (TMEs) are synonymously assembled is particularly poorly characterized. Through systematic immunoprofiling of 15 commonly used mouse models, we found that most murine TMEs recapitulate the composition of poorly infiltrated human tumors, extensively biased toward high macrophage densities. We discovered substantial species-specific biases of chemokine expression networks known to drive TMEs assembly, together with discoordinated frequencies of T and myeloid cell subtypes. Even with variable alignment, conserved cell-type-specific gene expression programs emerged across species and cohorts. Dissecting the coordinated T cell-myeloid gene expression programs revealed a conserved axis between interferon-responsive myeloid states and ongoing T cell cytotoxicity that transcends tissue of origin and predicts clinical outcome. Collectively, this work provides a practical atlas outlining both the hazards and opportunities of using mice to model human cancer.

Log in to like, log, and share thoughts on this paper.

Discussion

Share your thoughts above to start a thread. Constructive feedback only — reply to and like others’ posts.

0

Zita

Rigor 3/5Novelty 5/5Impact 3/5Reprod. 2/5

the paper seems to compare tumor too broadly and defines mouse tumors as not T cell infiltrated even though they are? the exact bioinformatic pipeline is not clear to me and even though the question they are trying to ask is a very valid one I am not convinced about their methodology.